Question 13: Application of the Treaty of Versailles 1919 and the declarations of Peace as an independent Nation leading to the Imperial Conference 1926 and Proclamation as separate Realm in 1927.

Answer 13: In conjunction with Question 12 which already details the chain of events leading through the Armistice that followed the Great War 1914-1918 and the ray of light that shines through the ceiling to commemorate that Armistice at 11am on the 11^th of November each year, it is clear that the Shrine of Remembrance is key evidence that Peace was declared and independent Sovereign Nation defined in International Laws.

62,000 men of the Commonwealth of Australia, family  and tribal men, went off to wars of aggression to defend their homelands from invasion by a foreign faith and power that had seen to attack the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland.

The Treaties at Versailles were ratified on the 10^th January 1920 which led to the Commonwealth of Australia joining the league of Nations which in its covenant at Article 22 defines that members are independent bodies separated from the former States that did govern them.

Section 8 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act July 1900 did define the Commonwealth of Australia, with its Preamble defining clearly the line of authority in the Imperial Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland.  This can also be directly see in the note that appears in the Schedule Oath to the Constitution at Clause 9 of the Act.

Declarations of Peace in Armistice of the Great War saw the Commonwealth of Australia come to Peace in War, and memorabilia defining the Peace clearly available on the historical record. 

The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland being a British Empire did sit through Imperial Conferences during the War and from the conferences of 1917, 1923, and 1926 did discuss moving forward post Armistice declaration to divide the British Empire.  In the Imperial Conference of 1926 it is clear by the Treaty that appears in the Schedule to the Conference that the Commonwealth of Australia did sign as Australia in its own independence from the motherland.

Imperial Conference 1926 did formerly invoke the changes that were declared at the Treaty of Versailles in 1919 that were ratified at the beginning of 1920.  At the ratification of the Treaties after all the countries involved had completed their treaties with the countries around them, the Commonwealth of Australia did then join the League of Nations.

This is reflected by Royal Style and Parliamentary Titles in 1927 breaking up the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland.  The Parliament of Great Britain requesting title in April 1927 declaring that then Monarch King George V had the ability to change the Style and Titles preferred by the Parliament.

King George V did then proclaim one month later in May of 1927 that the title of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland would be Great Britain alone with no United Kingdom defined and Ireland separated by name.  The current use of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland under Coronation Oath is outside of the lineage that was laid down before that Oath was taken.

The Commonwealth of Australia however was independent and sovereign as a country, defining its blessing to Almighty God through foundations within the Kings Domain.  It had for all intensive purpose defined itself as the Kingdom of Australia, Commonwealth of Australia by governance and established its Stone of Remembrance as the cornerstone to the Realm.

This Australian Government has since 1973 changes to the Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia taken from the people their rights under the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act July 1900 and the changes forged in battles by Australian Imperial Forces leading to Armistice and Treaty away from the people.

In changes to the Federal Government, the States of the Commonwealth of Australia then did realign themselves with this foreign administrative power that had shut down the Seat of Government of His Majesty and installed by coup its own Australian Government. 

It is clear through the Gough Whitlam Parliament that the Governor General did remove the de jure Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia and replace it with this Australia Government.  It is also clear through John Howards actions that he has wished to Compass the Queen of Australia at which he was under Oath of Allegiance and Oath of Office to, by removing the Head of State to which his allegiance is with and that he through 1999 referendum of the people attempted to subvert the line of authority in the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act July 1900 Preamble at which he declared that the Australian Constitution did not have a preamble.

In these actions it becomes clear that the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act July 1900 and the Australian Constitution are defined as separate and different documents.  It also becomes clear that the removal of the wording ‘Commonwealth of” is this government removing the right of the people.

The actions of Robert Menzies in declaring war in 1939 can now be put into context with the actions of John Curtin after Robert Menzies did step down from the Parliament also demonstrate that some in the Commonwealth of Australia knew they were being undermined having to put into the Commonwealth of Australia evidence directly of the Statute of Westminster 1931 by Adoption in 1942.

The sacrifice of 62,000 men of the Commonwealth of Australia should be enough to be honourable about the history of the country, but alas, there are power interests that would prefer that the people do not remember, and to keep them in a state of forgetfulness.  These powers ignore the established Sovereignty obtained by this sacrifice and ignore any reference to the foundations defined by the blessing of Almighty God.

This goes to the extent of Magistrates, Justices and even within the High Court itself defining Australia as a secular nation, to which they deny the blessing of Almighty God knowing that the line of authority is fractured and the judiciary sitting under the De Facto Doctrine.

Gokaraju Rangaraju v State of Andhra Province (1981) 3 SCC 132 it was held in the said judgement that: “A judge, de facto, is one who is not a mere intruder or usurper but one who holds office, under colour of lawful authority, even though his appointment is defective and may later be found to be so.  Whatever be the defect of his title to the office, judgment pronounced by him and acts done by him when he was clothed with the powers and functions of the office, albeit unlawfully, have the same eficiacy as judgments pronounced and acts done by a judge de jure.  Such is the de facto doctrine, born of necessity and public policy to prevent needless confusion and endless mischief”.

The Commonwealth of Australia being signatory to the Hague Conventions IV War on Land wherein is defined at Article 55 the Administration under the Rules of Usufruct is clearly under de facto administration since the installation of Admiralty Flags as National Flags in 1954 and the replacement of the White Ensign of the Admiralty Fleets in 1967 after the demise of currency in the Currency Act 1965.

The doctrine of necessity works both ways, in that the de jure sovereign native of the Commonwealth of Australia having pointed out the indiscretion of a line of authority has right by necessity to uphold rule of law unto the blessing of Almighty God.

Subjects of the Australian Imperial Crown so defined by Australian Imperial Forces and the Treaty at Versailles in 1919 have by their right through God at which they have been told to remember, Lest they Forget to return home to the land of their forefathers from the high seas of commerce once they discover the holy ground forged in the Kings Domain.

The Engineers Case 1920 is clear in its wording when it states “When the people of Australia, to use the words of the Constitution itself, "united in a Federal Commonwealth," they took power to control by ordinary constitutional means any attempt on the part of the national Parliament to misuse its powers. If it be conceivable that the representatives of the people of Australia as a whole would ever proceed to use their national powers to injure the people of Australia considered sectionally, it is certainly within the power of the people themselves to resent and reverse what may be done. No protection of this Court in such a case is necessary or proper. Therefore, the doctrine of political necessity, as means of interpretation, is indefensible on any ground. The one clear line of judicial inquiry as to the meaning of the Constitution must be to read it naturally in the light of the circumstances in which it was made, with knowledge of the combined fabric of the common law, and the statute law which preceded it, and then lucet ipsa per se.”

Conclusion 13: The people of the Commonwealth of Australia united in a Federal Commonwealth of Australia by Politicial Necessity have every right to recognize the lineage and blessing defined by the Holy Scripture under Almighty God to stand within their Kingdom of Australia defined by the Kings Domain.

The court is outside of its powers to undermine the peoples right under Almighty God and the foundations forged by Australian Imperial Forces in the Great War 1914-1918.  Magistrates become outside of power when confronted with the specific knowledge of the foundational structure of the independence of the Commonwealth of Australia.

If the people so choose to stand united in that Federal Commonwealth, the National Government is without power to injure the people standing in their inalienable right at which they gave power to the Constitution in the first place through Debates of Federation.

The sacrifice of ANZAC to define the people’s freedoms in International Waters put the Commonwealth of Australia on a world stage at which since 1967 has been put into Administration under the Rules of Usufruct.  It is up to the people as a united body politic to reverse this, thereby giving the De Facto doctrine credence to exist at law.

However, individually, the Sons of this Commonwealth of Australia have the ability to return to the inheritance of their forefathers in the recognition of the blessing of Almighty God.  The Commonwealth of Australia therefore as an indissoluble Federal Commonwealth can never be removed, it can only be administered by foreign admiralty powers.

This National Government cannot force an allegiance to what has compassed the Commonwealth of Australia and replaced its de jure with what is clearly defined as de facto administration at law.  The people have every right as defined in the Engineers Case 1920 to take power by ordinary constitutional means any attempt on the part of this National Government to misuse its powers.

This is very clear that whether individually or united that the people have the power to confront at law any attempt, no matter how large or small, this governments misuse of power. The people gave by constitution, the government its power in the first place, it is the people 'united in a Federal Commonwealth' that can remove those powers as well.