The Australia Act 1986 confuses many people in relation to what it was designed to do. This act even confuses the legal fraternities whom cannot explain it in its entirety. What it demonstrates without doubt is that the Monarchy of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland had been meddling in the affairs of the Commonwealth of Australia post Statute of Westminster Act 1931 wherein they defined they would no longer have the authority to do so.

We have seen how the States of the Commonwealth took it upon themselves to go outside of a line of authority in making the request and consent of the Federal Government in the first place. But here we have the Federal Government preparing Request and Consent requests to London in relation to a line of authority that the States had triggered by request and consent.

You can see by the Request and Consent Act 1985 that the "Parliament" and "Government" with concurrence of all the "States" have asked the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (not the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland) to enact laws that forbid any act of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from extending laws to the Commonwealth of Australia.

You can see here:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1931/4/pdfs/ukpga_19310004_en.pdf

4. No Act of Parliament of the United Kingdom passed after the commencement of this Act shall extend, or be deemed to extend, to a Dominion as part of the law of that Dominion, unless it is expressly declared in that Act that that Dominion has requested, and consented to, the enactment thereof.

That the Statute of Westminster 1931 at Section 4 already did for the Commonwealth of Australia what the Australia Act 1986 wants to do for this entity introduced in 1973 called "Australia".

113. AUSTRALIA (REQUEST AND CONSENT) ACT 1985
http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/num_act/aaca1985311/

Commencement
2. This Act shall come into operation on the day on which it receives the Royal Assent.
[Assented to 4 December 1985]

Request and consent to United Kingdom legislation
3. It is hereby declared that the Parliament and Government of the Commonwealth, with the concurrence of all the States, request and consent to the enactment by the Parliament of the United Kingdom of an Act in the terms set out in the Schedule.

Schedule
1. No Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom passed after the commencement of this Act shall extend, or be deemed to extend, to the Commonwealth, to a State or to a Territory as part of the law of the Commonwealth, of the State or of the Territory. Legislative powers of Parliament of States

a) The States were delivered Bravi Manu to the Commonwealth of Australia
b) Statute of Westminster 1931 followed the severing of power of the United Kingdom in Imperial Conference 1926
c) Commonwealth of Australia Sovereignty was declared joining the League of Nations
d) William M Hughes did sign the Treaty of Versailles as an independent authority.
e) The Shrine of Remembrance in the Kings Domain defines the Kingdom of Australia.

It is easy to see that almost the same request is being made of the United Kingdom as was made in Imperial Conference 1926 that led to the Statute of Westminster Act 1931 in the first place. We have this continued problem wherein the States are making request of the Commonwealth when the people already united out of Colonies to become the Federal Body. The States attempting to change a line of authority away from the people themselves and align with a non-commonwealth entity at law.

This can be demonstrated by the States changing the role of the Governors of State after the introduction of Letters Patent 1984 which re-constituted the Office of Governor-General of Australia removing any titles as Commander-In-Chief of the Armed Forces.

By way of affecting the Office and chain of command of the Governor and Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia, and affecting the Commonwealth with an outside entity called "Australia" we can see how the States are now attempting to align themselves with this entity introduced in 1973 in secret meetings during the Whitlam Era Government.

114. Governor - State Records Authority of New South Wales https://researchdata.edu.au/governor/165567

Pursuant to the Australia (Request and Consent) Act 1985 (Act No.109, 1985), the Australia Act 1986 was enacted by the British and Australian Commonwealth Parliaments. The Australia Act 1986 terminated the power of the Parliament of the United Kingdom to legislate for Australia. (34) The Act stated that the Crown would continue to be represented in each State by a Governor, but allowed for the Premier of each State to appoint and dismiss the State Governor (35), and removed the power of the State Governor to reserve Bills for Royal consideration. (36) The New South Wales Parliament subsequently amended the Constitution Act 1902, with the Constitution (Amendment) Act 1987, assented to 3 June 1987. (37) The Letters Patent dated 29 October 1900, as amended, and all Instructions relating to the office of Governor of New South Wales ceased to have effect on the commencement of this Act. (38) The holder of the office of Governor was deemed to have been appointed under the provisions of the Constitution (Amendment) Act 1987 (39), which reaffirmed that there shall continue to be a Governor of New South Wales (40), appointed by Commission under the Royal Sign Manual, and the Public Seal of the State. (41) The Act did not affect any law or established constitutional convention relating to the exercise or performance of the functions of the Governor other than on the advice of the Executive Council. (42)

a) The Australia Act 1986 removed the power of the Governor of State from the Crown
b) The Premier of each State appoints the Governor of State under the Australia Act 1986
c) The Governor of State cannot reserve Bills for Royal Consideration
d) Letters Patent 1900 applied to the States post Letters Patent 1984

Interestingly enough, what can be proven by several of the States actions in their legislations is that Queen Victoria's Letters Patent 1900 was still in place and relative law until it was removed by the States in preference for the Australia Act 1986 and the States therein removing Letters Patent 1900 in Public Service or as in the case of Queensland Office of the Governor Acts 1987. By this action alone we can see the States realigning themselves with a power foreign by removing any links to the Great Seal of the Commonwealth of Australia in Letters Patent 1900.

115. AUSTRALIA ACT 1986 (Cwlth)
An Act to bring constitutional arrangements affecting the Commonwealth and the States into conformity with the status of the Commonwealth of Australia as a sovereign, independent and federal nation
http://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2004A03181
[Assented to 4 December 1985]

1 Termination of power of Parliament of United Kingdom to legislate for Australia
No Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom passed after the commencement of this Act shall extend, or be deemed to extend, to the Commonwealth, to a State or to a Territory as part of the law of the Commonwealth, of the State or of the Territory.

a) Sovereignty is defined by the blessing of Almighty God
b) Legislation is subordinate to God
c) Statute of Westminster 1931 severed the United Kingdom
d) The States were delivered to the Commonwealth of Australia Brevi Manu
e) The States were issued Public Seals removing Colonial Seals.
f) The Commonwealth of Australia by Letters Patent was issued with Great Seal.
g) Sovereignty is not legislated, it comes under the blessing of Almighty God.
h) The Australia Act 1986 alters the Constitution S 51(38) without Referendum.
i) The Australia Act 1986 disregards Sovereignty proclaimed 1919-1926.

Genesis 12:2 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
²and I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing:

Sovereignty itself is defined by the blessing of Almighty God and is reflective of the Stone of Remembrance within the Kings Domain. This can easily be demonstrated by asking you to demonstrate the land mass you call Australia as defined by the Constitution. You cannot.

Genesis 22:17 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
¹⁷that in blessing I will bless thee, and in multiplying I will multiply thy seed as the stars of the heaven, and as the sand which is upon the sea shore; and thy seed shall possess the gate of his enemies;

The land is not defined within the Constitution because as a people Terra Australis existed as a mass of land at which Colonial Boundaries defined the separated colonies pre Constitution. After Federation in 1901, the States became part of the Commonwealth of Australia, and at Clause 8 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act July 1900 UK/PGA repealed the Colonial Boundaries Act 1895 and became a colony of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland in total.

Acts 7:33 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
³³Then said the Lord to him, Put off thy shoes from thy feet: for the place where thou standest is holy ground.

The importance of the Treaty of Versailles 1919 after the Armistice of the Great War 11th of November 1918 is the agreements between nations to boundaries as independant and sovereign bodies at which the Commonwealth of Australia sealed for itself International Boundaries within International Waters and truly rising up out of the waters to bring forth Holy Ground. That Holy Ground easily demonstrated within the Kings Domain by the very words "This is Holy Ground" on the forecourt.

Job 13:6-8 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
⁶Hear now my reasoning,
and hearken to the pleadings of my lips.
⁷Will ye speak wickedly for God?
and talk deceitfully for him?
⁸Will ye accept his person?
will ye contend for God?

116. AUSTRALIA ACT (UK)
An Act to give effect to a request by the Parliament and Government of the Commonwealth of Australia.
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1986/2
[17th February 1986]

1 Termination of power of Parliament of United Kingdom to legislate for Australia.
No Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom passed after the commencement of this Act shall extend, or be deemed to extend, to the Commonwealth, to a State or to a Territory as part of the law of the Commonwealth, of the State or of the Territory.

a) Statute of Westminster 1931 already detailed this disconnection of powers

The confusion between many people is that Australia had not become Sovereign in its own right as defined by Imperial Conference 1926, which led to the Statute of Westminster 1931. The belief is that Australia was expecting authority in return to implement the changes defined in the Australia Act 1986. It was not.

Post world war one, the Commonwealth of Australia as a people through the auspices of William M Hughes as Prime Minister of the Commonwealth of Australia joined the League of Nations by the Covenant of the League of Nations 1919 which was signed and agreed to at the end of the conferences of the Treaty of Versailles 1919.

This established a debt payment scheme in which the Commonwealth of Australia was responsible in its own part for the actions of the war and post war trade deals. The Commonwealth of Australia had stood up on its own feet amongst the nations of the world and defined its sovereign position by the loss of life in defence of that creation. Within the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, a fracturing of the Imperial Crown was taking place, the Commonwealth of Australia finally grounded with God through the actions of defence against other nations. We can see this directly in the chain of events from Armistice of the Great War 1918, the League of Nations 1919, the Imperial Conference 1926 and 1931, the Statute of Westminster 1931, the Kings Domain and Stone of Remembrance 1934 through to the Coronation Train of George VI in 1936.

At some point in time, the Federal Government had linked itself back to the control of London. We can see by the timeline that this can only have occurred after 1936. The actions of George VI by coronation train displaying Coat of Arms, Flag and Crown at Penrith Station in New South Wales 1936 demonstrate that abdication of the crown by Edward VIII did not have an affect on the Kingdom of Australia as displayed by George VI whom followed after Edward VIII.

In 1931 the Federal Government was independent as a Nation, and the Sovereignty within the Kings Domain defined the Kings Seat of Government under Section 125 of the Constitution at Clause 9 of the Constitution Act. The blessing of Almighty God that defined the land that became managed by the Parliament of the Commonwealth remained in place, now sealed in International Waters and the line of authority in God, King and Country was displayed very clearly before the people in 1936.

It can be surmised that "if" George VI held this authority until his demise in 1952, then the triggering factor re-linking authority back to London, that required severing in 1986 can only have occurred either during the time of George VI, or after his demise in 1952.

In looking into the problem that has occurred that demonstrates a line of authority to be at question with the removal of the "Commonwealth of" to its "Australia" in 1973 in secret meetings between the Queen and Gough Whitlam becoming central to this line of questioning. We can ask, where did the "Commonwealth" go?

Genesis 27:38 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
³⁸And Esau said unto his father, Hast thou but one blessing, my father? bless me, even me also, O my father. And Esau lifted up his voice, and wept.

We can also see that at the core, questioning a line of authority, we must look at the Oath of Allegiance, and the subsequent Oath of Office that is taken to become an actor for this entity we now call "Australia".

Luke 15:14-15 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
¹⁴And when he had spent all, there arose a mighty famine in that land; and he began to be in want. ¹⁵And he went and joined himself to a citizen of that country; and he sent him into his fields to feed swine.

In 2015 the news reported on the misuse of Oath of Office by the Judiciary of both Queensland and Tasmania. Magistrates that had entered office in 2013 though 2015 were thought to have taken an oath in the incorrect form. This raises many questions that the people of the Commonwealth should have stood up and challenged in the fullest.

We can see by the Oath of Office of Queensland Judiciary that follows, that there is a stark difference in the changes made in 2013. We can also see that it is considered wrong by the "State" which as we have also shown is in direct line of authority of the Commonwealth of Australia as per the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act which at the Schedule to the Constitution at Clause 9 contains an oath of the correct form.

If we connect dots by timeline we can see that in 2015 the State has defined the usage of an incorrect Oath of Office which was defined by legislation in 2013. If we look at the declaration that the wrong oath had been in use for 30 years this takes us back to 1983 which is previous to Letters Patent 1984 and the Australia Act 1986 as well. We must also consider here that in 2013 when an incorrect oath was announced going back as early as 1983, a correct oath of some form had been in use for 83 years.

117. Queensland and Tasmanian Judiciary takes wrong Oath for 30 Years

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/australiaandthepacific/australia/11565735/Australian-state-discovers-magistrates-have-taken-wrong-oath-for-30-years.html

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-05-07/queensland-magistrates-used-wrong-oath-during-swearing-in/6451980

https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/national/queensland/queensland-magistrates-took-wrong-oath-20150507-ggw5xy.html

a) Queensland Judiciary admit to be under incorrect oaths from 1985 through 2015
b) Oath of Allegiance cannot be changed as defined in the Schedule in the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution.
c) Sovereignty changed under Imperial Conference 1926.

Without going into the legislational changes to Queensland, as they occur in all States in some form or another, it is easy to see the difference in the Oath as compared to the Oath at the Schedule to the Constitution. Prior to 2013 the form of the Oath to Queen Elizabeth II was in accordance with the Schedule Oath to the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution at Clause 9 of the Constitution Act. Post 2013, changes to the Oath are then in alignment with the Pledge of Allegiance already discussed as in use by the Department of Immigration for "Australia".

This is easy to see when you are taking by oath directly, a link to an entity "Australia" instead of God through a Monarch as per the Royal Law in the Scripture.

118. Reforming of the Oath of Allegiance and Oath of Office 2013 for Queensland
https://www.courts.qld.gov.au/court-users/practitioners/admissions/oaths-and-affirmations
Oath of allegiance
I, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ do sincerely promise and swear, that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance, to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, as lawful sovereign of Australia, and her other realms and territories, and to her heirs and successors, according to law. So help me God.

a) Queensland and Tasmanian Judiciaries fix their Oaths of Office after 30 years proving Oaths are specific and need to be correct to define a Line of Authority.
b) Queensland Judiciary took Oath to Queen Elizabeth the Second.
c) To be lawful Sovereign would entail Coronation to the Realm of Australia.

Another question arises out of all of these changes since 1919. If this Oath of Allegiance is so important, and the challenges people make in relation to a line of authority ignored so vehemently, why then the continual push and want to remove from it altogether.

We have already seen how John Howard committed a technical and direct Act of Treason within the doors of the Parliament of the Commonwealth (Australian Government) by directly requesting the removal of the Head of State in which he was under Oath of Allegiance and direct line of authority. It is also questionable that these actions are directly linked in his own writings relative to former Prime Minister Robert Menzies, and therein Robert Menzies actions into World War 2 and his continual push for a republic since 1942.

John Howard is proven to have attempted to remove a line of authority in the blessing of Almighty God, Queen and Country and replace it all with a Republic by way of deceitful referendum at which answering yes to either question would have allowed his request to occur.

119. AUSTRALIA ACTS (REQUEST) ACT 1999
An Act to request the amendment of the Australia Acts 1986 in connection with proposed constitutional arrangements to establish the Commonwealth of Australia as a republic

https://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/view/pdf/asmade/act-1999-036 3. If the proposed law is approved by the Australian people, it is desirable that the Australia Act 1986 of the Commonwealth and the Australia Act 1986 of the Parliament of the United Kingdom be amended to remove any impediment to the alteration by a State of its laws relating to the powers and functions of Her Majesty and the Governor in respect of the State.

a) The Australia Act 1986 has been used in attempt to undermine the Realm
b) The States have attempted to undermine the people of the Commonwealth
c) The Preamble defines the people of the States uniting.
d) Request is being asked of the United Kingdom to modify law.

There are many questions that arise out of all of this. Firstly, the actions of Robert Menzies during World War 2 wherein he announced war on behalf of the British Parliament within 1-3 hours of the British Prime Minister announcing war on Germany for actions against Poland in 1939. This leads to John Curtin installing the Statute of Westminster Adoption Act 1942 (suspect action given sovereignty became of it), and then sided with the United States in the war effort and angering the British.

Secondly, the links to the United Kingdom being severed completely by Imperial Conference 1926 and thereby legislated that the United Kingdom Parliament have no effect on the Commonwealth of Australia in Statute of Westminster 1931. We have an Abdication of the Throne by Edward VIII but then a display of Sovereign Status in Coronation Train of George VI demonstrating continued Sovereignty previous to World War 2.

And then thirdly, how did the Commonwealth of Australia, allow "Australia" to have continued links with the United Kingdom post Imperial Conference 1926 and Statute of Westminster 1931 that severed those links entirely. Why then a need to sever those links again by way of the Australia Act 1986 defining the line of authority in the States of the Commonwealth which in 1900 were in line of authority to the people being the body corporate that is the Commonwealth of Australia.

For those that have not read through all the facts. In 1967 the Admiralty Ensign of His Majesties Fleet was lowered and replaced with an Admiralty Flag introduced in 1908 under Hague Conventions IV War on Land. These conventions pushed to see the end of the use of your Land War Flag known as a Federal Red Ensign. This Admiralty change saw to Administration under the Rules of Usufruct the Commonwealth of Australia by a foreign admiral entity and the loss of your "Commonwealth of" and the introduction of this entity "Australia" to manage the bankruptcy of the "Commonwealth of Australia". It is since 1973 that Gods People, the people that became that Commonwealth of Australia did by their own Pledge leave the Commonwealth in choice of this other "Australia". All the problems you see, are this Federal Government attempting to hide the fact that it is an Administration of what technically belongs to the people as Sons and Heirs of Gods Estates.

All in all the strange thing is the Commonwealth of Australia severed from the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland in 1919 with post enacted legislation defining this change within the jurisdictions of the parliament. And herein you have Australia severing itself from the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland in 1986 by way of Australia Acts following secret meetings that led to Letters Patent 1984 and the Parliament discussing how to enact by legislation instead of referendum the following Australia Acts.

A question for everyone. If the Commonwealth of Australia by Imperial Conference 1926 became independent and by Statute of Westminster 1931 became separate and independent from the UK Parliament with the United Kingdom issuing Parliamentary Style and Title 1927, how then does the Commonwealth of Australia have any obligation to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland if it was separated from its former United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland?