The Kings Diction

So far we have discussed some technicalities relating to the Realm and Estates of the People at which a Monarch being a King or Queen becomes Supreme Head of as Executor of the People using a Great Seal of the Realm to seal all things created within the Estates.

We have looked at the foundations in God leading to Titles defining the specific aspects of the Estates including the Throne and Crown. What is very clear is that until 1927 the Realm was Imperial and the Throne and Crown head of that Imperial Realm.

The Title to the Realm in 1927 being reduced to Great Britain and separate dominions of status being considered dominions across the seas as the Empire is divided in post war treaties that lead up to Imperial Conferences.

It is obvious to state that many more changes occur between 1927 and 1953 when Queen Elizabeth is coronated. But as we have seen, the Queen uses the Parliamentary Title 1927 as the Oath taken during that coronation process. We know this to be incorrect in relation to Royal Title 1927 being reduced to Great Britain and the United Kingdom part abandoned by George V in proclomation.

We can now see by their self admittance that the Royal House of Queen Elizabeth II on their own web site they admit that the Coronation Process was not in accordance with the Laws of the Estates.

20. 50 FACTS ABOUT THE QUEENS CORONATION
https://www.royal.uk/50-facts-about-queens-coronation-0
6. The Coronation service used for Queen Elizabeth II descends directly from that of King Edgar at Bath in 973. The original 14th century order of service was written in Latin and was used until the Coronation of Elizabeth I.
15. On her way to the Coronation, Her Majesty wore the George IV State Diadem - the crown depicted on stamps. Made in 1820, the Diadem features roses, shamrocks and thistles with 1,333 diamonds and 169 pearls. 
30. The Coronation ring, known as 'The Wedding Ring of England' was placed on The Queen's fourth finger of her right hand in accordance with tradition. Made for the Coronation of King William IV in 1831 (George IV brother), the ring has been worn at every coronation since then, except of Queen Victoria, whose fingers were so small that the ring could not be reduced far enough in size and an alternative was created.

a) Queen Elizabeth II did not follow the process defined at law
b) Queen Elizabeth II did use George IV State Diadem and uses Oaths of George IV
b) Queen Elizabeth II did not use Lineage defined by Queen Victoria in George I.
d) Queen Victoria did not use Crown Ring.

Queen Elizabeth II has used Coronation process that existed earlier than the Coronation Oath 1688 defined by the Protestant King and Queen of William and Mary after they had removed the last Catholic King from England during the Glorious Revolution 1688. The Authorized King James Bible was founded in 1603 as the Will and Testimony of the Realm of England and has been used to forge the Commonwealth of Australia under the reign of Queen Victoria, yet here we have a Coronation Process that takes on a form that preceded that foundation.

We can also see that the process used by Queen Elizabeth II was in the same as King Edgar of Bath 973. Wearing the ring of George IV which was subsequently not worn by Queen Victoria, created for the William IV coronation, the brother of George IV. George IV and William IV were Hanoverians. George IV wanted to marry a Roman Catholic and saw the Roman Catholic Relief Act 1829 installed after Irish Catholics rose up in attempt to defame the Church of England.

We will see later that Queen Victoria removes the House of Hanover from the crown altogether in Proclomation defined in 1837 after her Coronation to the Throne. The question that needs to be asked, are the Papists, Roman Catholic influencing the Crown of Great Britain by taking Parliamentary Titles?

One of the justices of the Supreme Court in Australia remarked that the Queen had a Moral Obligation and that the law of the State carried on regardless. What we have demonstrated is that God is the cornerstone of all law, with Governments on the shoulder of that foundation. We have also demonstrated that Queen Elizabeth II took an Oath in which she states " I solemnly promise so to do" and "all this I promise to do".

It is clear that the Queen is under a Solemn Promise and not merely just a Moral Obligation.

21. MORAL OBLIGATION
1. A duty which one owes, and which he ought to perform, but which he is not legally bound to fulfill.
2. These obligations are of two kinds 1st. Those founded on a natural right; as, the obligation to be charitable, which can never be enforced by law. 2d. Those which are supported by a good or valuable antecedent consideration; as, where a man owes a debt barred by the act of limitations, this cannot be recovered by law, though it subsists in morality and conscience; but if the debtor promise to pay it, the moral obligation is a sufficient consideration for the promise, and the creditor may maintain an action of assumpsit, to recover the money. 1 Bouv. Inst. n. 623.

a) One is not legally bound to a Moral Obligation.

When we look at a Moral Obligation at law, one is technically not legally bound to keep or fulfill a moral obligation. It is a sense of morality in that one is expected to act a certain way but is not obligated at law to do so.

This differs greatly from a solemn promise which involves engaging in a contract position to perform certain duties. The Queen by taking Coronation Oath is obligated to the office of Supreme Head of the Realm and Estates of the People holding Royal Seal of the Realm to pass the creations that occur within the Estates.

22. PROMISE
1. An engagement by which the promisor contracts towards another to perform or do something to the advantage of the latter.
2. When a promise is reduced to the form of a written agreement under seal, it is called a covenant.
3. In order to be binding on the promisor, the promise must be made upon a sufficient consideration -- when made without consideration, however, it may be binding in foro conscientice, it is not obligatory in law, being nudum pactum. Rutherf. Inst. 85; 18 Eng. C. L. Rep. 180, note a; Merl. Rep. h.t.
4. When a promise is made, all that is said at the time, in relation to it, must be considered; if, therefore, a man promise to pay all he owes, accompanied by a denial that he owes anything, no action will lie to enforce such a promise. 15 Wend. 187. 5. And when the promise is conditional, the condition must be performed before it becomes of binding force. 7 John. 36. Vide Condition. Promises are express or implied. Vide Undertaking, and 5 East, 17 2 Leon. 224, 5; 4 B. & A. 595.

2 Peter 3:9 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
⁹ The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.

a) A Moral Obligation is not a Promise.
b) Queen Elizabeth the Second did Solemnly Promise according to the respective laws and customs of Australia.
c) Queen Elizabeth the Second did make Promise to use her “power” to cause Law and Justice, in Mercy, to be executed in all her judgements.
d) Queen Elizabeth the Second did state “All this I promise to do”.

We can see by the definition of the term promise at law that when a promise is reduced to the form of a written agreement under seal, it is called a covenant.

Genesis 6:18 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
¹⁸ But with thee will I establish my covenant; and thou shalt come into the ark, thou, and thy sons, and thy wife, and thy sons’ wives with thee.

Genesis 9:9 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
⁹ And I, behold, I establish my covenant with you, and with your seed after you;

Genesis 9:12 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
¹² And God said, This is the token of the covenant which I make between me and you and every living creature that is with you, for perpetual generations:

We can see through the Scripture by Genesis alone that God through his blessing made a covenant between the people and God for the inheritance by their future generations. The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act July 1900 by way of Debates of Federation is that covenant at which Sons of the Commonwealth are supposed to inherit in the image of their forefathers. What this means is that the estates of the people are in the name of the LORD being the Commonwealth of Australia.

Leviticus 18:30 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
³⁰ Therefore shall ye keep mine ordinance, that ye commit not any one of these abominable customs, which were committed before you, and that ye defile not yourselves therein: I am the Lord your God.

John 18:39 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
³⁹ But ye have a custom, that I should release unto you one at the passover: will ye therefore that I release unto you the King of the Jews?

The Queen also during Coronation Oath did solemnly promise to uphold the laws and custom of the Realm at which she became Supreme Head. The question then becomes, what is Queen Elizabeth II Supreme Head of if the specific Title in Coronation Oath is not in a line of authority to Royal Titles proclaimed by George V in May of 1927 after alteration of Royal Styles and Parliamentary Titles of April 1927.

23. CUSTOM
Custom in law is the established pattern of behavior that can be objectively verified within a particular social setting. A claim can be carried out in defense of "what has always been done and accepted by law.". Related is the idea of prescription; a right enjoyed through long custom rather than positive law.

Custom by all purpose generally means acting in the image of ones forefathers and carrying on the Estates in the will of the father. This is done through a promise to identify with the will and testimony and inheritance from the father. A covenant and legal binding document at which the sons gain inheritance in the first place.

The Sons of the Commonwealth did inherit the covenant or agreement in the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act July 1900 from the trinity in God. That trinity is as we know the Son, the Father and the Holy Spirit. We can deduce by means of this Estates of the People that this means the Sons of the Commonwealth in each and every subject, the Forefathers of that Federation such as Henry Parkes a man dubbed as the Father of Federation and the Holy Spirit of the ANZAC touted to be living 100 years later.

John 14:26 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
²⁶ But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.

Psalm 51:11 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
¹¹ Cast me not away from thy presence;
and take not thy holy spirit from me.

It is therefore up to the people, like grains of sand to gather in weight against the lead on the scales. Eventually, acting in the custom of their forefathers and those that spilt blood so they may live by still waters, that the covenant of God will be returned to them.

Genesis 1:26 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
²⁶ And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

Genesis 1:27 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
²⁷ So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

Exodus 20:4 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
⁴ Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth:

The people need to look at what is occurring and return to that inheritance given them by God by covenant in the image of their fathers. They have slain Abel and preferred the ways of Cain in the Towers of Babel wherein the city and the mighty dollar is more important than the Grace of Gods Covenant. They have taken from a money lender and abandoned their inheritance with the RBA and false promises in Reserve Currency as Esau did for a Bowl of Soup when his brother Joseph inherited the fathers estate.

We start to see a technical Will and Testament is left by Forefathers in which the Sons of the Commonwealth of Australia by promise have allowed them to live in freedom with God.

Habakkuk 1:14 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
¹⁴ And makest men as the fishes of the sea,
as the creeping things, that have no ruler over them?

For the other choice is to be treated by International Laws within international waters that exist beneath the earth not founded as holy ground by the people in their unity as per the Preamble of that Covenant.

Genesis 1:9 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
⁹ And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so.

By that Covenant the Holy Spirit of the ANZAC did raise the ground up through the waters to establish the Realm and Kingdom that exists and is displayed in the Kings Domain. We will look more into this as we go through further facts.

Luke 15:14-15 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
¹⁴ And when he had spent all, there arose a mighty famine in that land; and he began to be in want. ¹⁵ And he went and joined himself to a citizen of that country; and he sent him into his fields to feed swine.

It is hoped that a picture is starting to form in your minds, showing you what this all represents and how the people have abandoned Gods Estate in the Commonwealth of Australia to join a foreign entity in their lands. And that we can start to look at returning by Will of the Father to the Inheritance at which those ANZAC sacrifice life and limb for you to have.

SUPPORT

To be able to put these arguments before the Courts over Constitutional Matters involves quite an amount of time and money. Your support is required to be able to get this done. There are challenges that are being forged in relation to Case Law and Foundational Claims by the Australian Government being incorrect. You can see by the Facts being presented that this is knowledge that everyone needs to know.

For this to happen, we need to be able to work on those presentations as well as put forward the funding to be able to enter those court rooms due to the fact that for years the representative of this Australian Government have remained in silence.

The easiest way to do that is to grab something for yourself from our online store. This gives Steven the ability to research and structure the documents that eventually get shared with you. This also allows for the travel, printing, filing and general ongoing expenses of putting this before the systems at law.

Checkout our latest shirts online at http://shop.stevenspiers.com

You can also support these actions directly by going over to our support page and contributing directly.

http://stevenspiers.com/index.php/support/

We thank all of you that have so far contribute giving the ability to enter the District Court wherein a challenge is already in play. This will be furthered to bring Constitutional Matters before the Federal Courts as well as take matters into the Supreme Court.

United Kingdom of Australia

Copyright 2023 House of Spiers