We have already defined some foundational concepts as to how we define the Commonwealth of Australia and started to look at what it means to have a line of authority.

When we look at history we can see that in the Commonwealth of Australia that Quick and Garren formed the Annotated Constitution. These two legal experts defined the specifics to how the constitution was formed and how it relied on case law to give it credence.

The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act through Debates of Federation came out of the God given rights of a people, it can be demonstrated to be given rights as well as limitation. It therefore cannot be what defines the rights of the people and should be seen more as to the limitations of the Public Service, or servants of the people.

In English Law we see that Halsbury's Laws as well as the works of William Blackstone follow the credence as Quick and Garren do in relation to the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act July 1900.

We have looked at the Oath of Allegiance as well as the Coronation Oath and how the two are very much linked together by way of being the same Crown Estate at which a subject is in allegiance with. Halsbury's defines that a King may not rule subjects in a foreign country and we know through Clause 8 of the Constitution Act that the Commonwealth of Australia at its founding was considered a colony of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland.

Halsbury's Law goes further by stating that a King has rule over the Dominions belonging to that Crown Estate as detailed in the kings Royal Title.

7. HALSBURY’S LAWS OF ENGLAND PART IV
The Royal Family, states that
"The King may not rule his subjects as King of any foreign country, but only as King of England and the dominions belonging thereto as expressed in the royal title."

a) The king may not rule subjects of any foreign country
b) The king is King of England
c) The king has dominions belonging under Royal Titles

Joshua 10:42 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
⁴²And all these kings and their land did Joshua take at one time, because the Lord God of Israel fought for Israel.

We can see that within the Scripture that Joshua fought for Israel (we have discussed this not to be Israel the Nation State and instead being Is-ra-el of hermetic or Mason knowledge) and we can see that Joshua claimed the kings one by one. As estates of the people, the king can be seen as the executor of the estate whom holds the seal of office that defines the creations or actions of the estate.

Joshua 12:9-24 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
⁹the king of Jericho, one; the king of Ai, which is beside Beth-el, one; ¹⁰the king of Jerusalem, one; the king of Hebron, one; ¹¹the king of Jarmuth, one; the king of Lachish, one; ¹²the king of Eglon, one; the king of Gezer, one; ¹³the king of Debir, one; the king of Geder, one; ¹⁴the king of Hormah, one; the king of Arad, one; ¹⁵the king of Libnah, one; the king of Adullam, one; ¹⁶the king of Makkedah, one; the king of Beth-el, one; ¹⁷the king of Tappuah, one; the king of Hepher, one; ¹⁸the king of Aphek, one; the king of Lasharon, one; ¹⁹the king of Madon, one; the king of Hazor, one; ²⁰the king of Shimron-meron, one; the king of Achshaph, one; ²¹the king of Taanach, one; the king of Megiddo, one; ²²the king of Kedesh, one; the king of Jokneam of Carmel, one; ²³the king of Dor in the coast of Dor, one; the king of the nations of Gilgal, one; ²⁴the king of Tirzah, one: all the kings thirty and one.

The Commonwealth of Australia by Constitution had followed in the footsteps of the Laws of England but had also taken from the United States model in that it was debated to form a Constitution in the first place. England however wasnt born out of one document creation, the Scripture forms the foundation with a layering of Declarations and Charters. We can see through Parliamentary Statute that these are recognised as can been seen in the Restraint of Appeals.

8. ACT IN RESTRAINT OF APPEALS 1533
https://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/tudor-england/the-act-in-restraint-of-appeals/
“Where by divers sundry old authentic histories and chronicles it is manifestly declared and expressed that this realm of England is an empire, and so hath been accepted in the world, governed by one supreme head and king having the dignity and royal estate of the imperial crown of the same, unto whom a body politic, compact of all sorts and degrees of people divided in terms and by names of spirituality and temporalty, be bounden and owe to bear next to God a natural and humble obedience; he being also institute and furnished by the goodness and sufferance of Almighty God with plenary, whole and entire power, pre-eminence, authority, prerogative and jurisdiction to render and yield justice and final determination to all manner of folk resiants or subjects within this realm, in all causes, manners, debates and contentions happening to occur, insurge or begin within the limits thereof, without restraint or provocation to any foreign princes or potentates of the world;

a) Supreme Head of the Imperial Crown Realm
b) Bound and owe bear to God.

Esther 1:20 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
²⁰And when the king’s decree which he shall make shall be published throughout all his empire, (for it is great,) all the wives shall give to their husbands honour, both to great and small.

It is defined in 1533 that England is an empire, having dominions and territory extra territorial to the island kingdom. We can also see clearly defined that the Royal Estate is of the Imperial Crown of that estate of the king. All of this is bound and is owed to the foundations defined by the Will of God and is to be obeyed as that foundation.

This defines the King of England as the Supreme Head bound by God of the English Empire. This is before the Union of Crowns occurs over two centuries later. We can see as well that God is defined to have plenary, whole and entire power that the king is the institute of. This defines the Royal Law in the scripture to be the foundation of all law.

So through Facts 1to 8 we can demonstrate that the King is the Executor of Estates at which the people show allegiance through Oath to. The king takes Oath to the whole power of God putting the Scripture at the root of all.

9. ACT OF SUPREMACY 1558
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Eliz1/1/1
VIII All Spiritual Jurisdiction united to the Crown.
And That suche Jurisdictions Privileges Superiorities and Preheminences Spirituall and Ecclesiasticall, as by any Spirituall or Ecclesiasticall Power or Aucthorite hathe heretofore bene or may lawfully be exercised or used for the Visitacion of the Ecclesiasticall State and Persons, and for Reformacion Order and Correccion of the same and of all maner of Errours Heresies Scismes Abuses Offences Contemptes and Enormities, shall for ever by aucthorite of this present Parliament be united and annexed to the Imperiall Crowne of this Realme: . . .

a) United and Annexed to the Imperial Crown of the Realm
b) Ecclesiastical State and Persons of the Realm

The Act of Supremacy goes further to define the ecclesiastical State and Persons, and how the State and Persons required reforming. We know that Queen Elizabeth did this by installing the Common Book of Prayer and saw reformation of the English Throne. A throne at the centre of an Imperial Realm under the whole authority of Gods grace.

This also then defines the Parliament to be annexed to the Imperial Crown of the Realm. The beginning of what could be considered a Constitutional Monarchy wherein the people of England sat in the Spiritual, Temporal and Commons as trustees in the estates of God.

Ezra 7:23 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
²³Whatsoever is commanded by the God of heaven, let it be diligently done for the house of the God of heaven: for why should there be wrath against the realm of the king and his sons?

Biblically the heracy, abuses and offences against the Realm had led to this coming to fruition with Queen Elizabeth staunchly standing up for the Realm and Kingdom of England and its extra-territorial dominion 500 years ago.

What we can ultimately surmise from this is that the King is the Supreme Head of Estates of the People with the whole obligated to the rules set out in the Scripture to define the Realms foundations both in law as well as in time and space. We can see how the people through Oath honour God through the kings oath to the Realm itself. This forms a line of authority from the Holy Scripture down to those in Oath of Office, and ultimately the people of God.

As we go through the facts laid out, we will see how these compound on each other to define without question the specifics to how the founding of the Commonwealth of Australia came to be, and how it forged its sovereignty in battle spilling blood first so those that came after could live by still waters. It is through this comprehension that we will gain a knowledge to be able to see how it became an occupied country that has lost its sovereignty.

In this, at international laws, we might one day be able to return to that sovereignty as a people under the blessing of Almighty God.

The Kings Diction

Most Noble Order of the Desert Flame

Australian Imperial Crown

Judicature - Fact Series

Fact Series - Part 4